
When Birminghamβs Safety Advisory Group decided to ban Maccabi Tel Aviv fans from next monthβs Europa League match at Villa Park β supposedly βfor safetyβ β they didnβt just sideline football supporters. They sent a message: Jewish presence equals provocation. ππ£
Letβs call this what it is β moral cowardice dressed up in fluorescent police vests. The same authorities whoβve stood by for two years as βdeath to Jewsβ chants echoed through British streets suddenly rediscovered their sense of βpublic orderβ the moment Israelis wanted to watch a game. Funny how safety concerns only ever point in one direction. π§
π« The Goalposts of Hypocrisy
So, let me get this straight: antisemitic mobs can march through London unbothered, but Jewish football fans are too dangerous to sit in a stadium? Thatβs not crowd control β thatβs appeasement by policy. If this were any other group being collectively punished for existing, thereβd be government inquiries and celebrity hashtags within hours.
Instead, we get the police playing PR football β booting the problem out of sight and calling it βsecurity.β Itβs the oldest trick in the bureaucratic playbook: when justice feels complicated, ban the victims instead. ππ½ππ½ππ½
Whatβs next β a βneutralβ section for Jews behind bulletproof glass? Or maybe a polite sign outside stadiums reading: βDue to safety concerns, Jews are asked to disappear.β
Because if thatβs what βsafetyβ looks like, then prejudice has scored the winning goal β and no one even bothered to blow the whistle. π΄ββ οΈ
π₯Β ChallengesΒ π₯
Is this really about safety β or about surrender? Are we watching the death of fair play, not just in football, but in free society? βοΈ
π¬ Drop your take in the blog comments β not just Facebook. Should Jewish fans stay silent, or is it time the crowd started chanting back?
π Comment. Like. Share. Keep the debate alive β the best takes will make it into our next magazine issue. ποΈβ‘


Leave a comment