
Ah, the Oxford Union β that hallowed temple of βcivilised debate,β where the next generation of world leaders learns how to ruin their reputations before finals week. Once the proud arena of oratory giants, itβs now reduced to an undergraduate circus where hypocrisy and hubris take turns at the dispatch box.
And this week? The Unionβs self-proclaimed intellectual elite managed to outdo even themselves. Their president-elect β a 20-year-old PPE wunderkind β apparently thought it would be clever to celebrate the shooting of a free speech advocate online. Because nothing says βfuture of reasoned discourseβ quite like laughing at someone getting shot for having an opinion. π₯π
π§βπ The Union of Unenlightenment
Picture it: mahogany walls, gilt-framed portraits of past presidents (many of whom are now regretting their life choices), and in the middle of it all, a leadership scandal worthy of Love Island: Political Science Edition.
Our young orator β once destined to lead the Union this term β instead triggered a vote of no confidence in himself, which is basically the debating societyβs version of setting fire to your own podium and insisting itβs performance art.
And now the fallout is biblical: high-profile speakers cancelling, donations drying up, and the Unionβs credibility evaporating faster than port at a Tory fundraiser. The institution that produced prime ministers can barely produce a functioning apology. π·π₯
ποΈ The Irony Olympics
Hereβs the twist: this debacle isnβt just about one studentβs idiocy. Itβs about the Unionβs total addiction to self-importance.
They call themselves βthe home of free speechβ β and yet canβt tell the difference between debate and digital delinquency. They claim to shape the leaders of tomorrow, but at this rate, tomorrowβs leaders will need adult supervision and a social media filter.
Letβs be clear β this isnβt Parliament. Itβs not even a parish council. These are undergraduates playing dress-up in borrowed blazers, pretending to defend civilisation while accidentally dismantling it in real time.
The Oxford Union doesnβt need another scandal; it needs a gap year. π§³π°οΈ
π Lessons in Leadership (from People Who Canβt Lead)
Maybe, just maybe, this is the moment the Union should stop mistaking arrogance for intellect and attention for achievement.
If youβre going to defend free speech, at least try not to make the concept look actively repulsive.
And yet, if weβre true to the principle, we shouldnβt call for expulsions or cancellations either. The punishment for bad ideas should always be better ideas β or, in this case, a few years of quiet reflection away from microphones, press releases, and the word βpresident.β
π₯ Challenges π₯
How long can the Oxford Union claim to defend free speech when its leaders keep using it to blow their own credibility to bits? π§¨
Is this the collapse of a great debating tradition β or just another chapter in the worldβs longest-running student farce?
Drop your thoughts in the comments β not on social media, where irony goes to die, but on the blog where ideas still have teeth. π¬β‘
π Comment. Like. Share.
The sharpest, wittiest takes will be featured in the next issue of the magazine. π―π


Leave a comment