Eighty years ago, the United Nations was born from the ashes of world war, a beacon of peace meant to โ€œsave succeeding generations from the scourge of war.โ€ Fast-forward to today, and itโ€™s more like a very expensive group chat where no one listens and everyoneโ€™s on mute. The UN Security Council โ€” that sacred stage of diplomacy โ€” now resembles a geopolitical soap opera where the dialogue is scripted, the tension performative, and the ending always the same: โ€œWe deeply regret the situation.โ€

๐ŸŽ™๏ธย Diplomacy or Drama? Welcome to the Global Talent Show

On a good day, the UN is less โ€œguardian of peaceโ€ and more โ€œopen-mic night for global egos.โ€ Youโ€™ve got the US performing its greatest hits (โ€œWe take this very seriouslyโ€), Russia playing the villain with theatrical menace, and China perfecting the art of the serene smirk. Somewhere in the corner, a delegate from a smaller nation actually tries to talk about famine or refugees โ€” only to be politely drowned out by applause for a speech on โ€œprincipled multilateralism.โ€

The UNโ€™s humanitarian wings still do heroic work โ€” feeding millions, saving lives โ€” but the Security Council itself has become a kind of moral museum piece. The grand ideals are still engraved on the walls, but inside, the air smells faintly of hypocrisy and stale diplomacy. Russia invades a neighbour? China blocks the motion. America frowns, vetoes fly, and the world keeps spinning โ€” bloodied but unchanged.

And then thereโ€™s the choreography. Each crisis brings the same dance: grave faces, urgent meetings, condemnations โ€œin the strongest possible terms,โ€ followed by โ€” you guessed it โ€” inaction. The UN is now less the conscience of the world and more its echo chamber. A theatre for the powerful to posture while the powerless perish quietly offstage. ๐ŸŽญ

๐Ÿ’ผย The 80-Year Existential Crisis

At 80, the UN should be the wise elder of world affairs. Instead, it feels like a once-great institution trapped in its own bureaucracy, muttering โ€œwe must do betterโ€ while handing out glossy reports. The Charter promised peace, justice, and cooperation; what we got is polite paralysis, endless resolutions, and a front-row seat to global decline.

As for Donald Trumpโ€™s America? He treated the UN like a subscription he didnโ€™t remember signing up for. Russia and China now treat it like a stage for national branding. And everyone else? Theyโ€™re just trying to keep the lights on.

If the UN were a theatre, it would be one where the ushers have gone home, the audience is asleep, and the actors are arguing about who forgot their lines.

๐Ÿ”ฅย Challengesย ๐Ÿ”ฅ

Is the UN still worth saving โ€” or is it just a relic dressed in diplomatic theatre? Should global power be rebuilt elsewhere, or can this ageing institution ever rediscover its mission? Drop your verdict below โ€” satire, outrage, or reluctant hope all welcome. ๐Ÿ’ฌ๐ŸŒ

๐Ÿ‘‡ Comment, like, and share โ€” the best takes will make it into our next issue. Letโ€™s hear your voice before another committee drafts a โ€œstatement of concern.โ€ ๐Ÿ—ž๏ธ๐Ÿ”ฅ

Leave a comment

Ian McEwan

Why Chameleon?
Named after the adaptable and vibrant creature, Chameleon Magazine mirrors its namesake by continuously evolving to reflect the world around us. Just as a chameleon changes its colours, our content adapts to provide fresh, engaging, and meaningful experiences for our readers. Join us and become part of a publication thatโ€™s as dynamic and thought-provoking as the times we live in.

Let’s connect