🫣🔁Once again, the Prime Minister has dusted off his favourite press conference punchline: “I trust Rachael Reeves did nothing wrong.” Because apparently, learning from past humiliation isn’t part of the Chancellor vetting process.
🤝 Trust Me, Bro – The Government Strategy Handbook
Let’s be honest: this isn’t the PM’s first trust tumble. He’s been here before — backing ministers, aides, donors, and “close friends” right up until the police, the press, or public outrage dragged him into reality. And now, Chancellor Rachael Reeves is the latest recipient of his selective amnesia.
Because sure, why not offer a vote of confidence before facts are out, before investigations are done, and while the public is still choking on the smoke of the last scandal?
If political trust was a currency, the PM would be bankrupt and still borrowing.
🧠 How Many Times Can You Get Burned Before You Learn to Duck?
Trusting Rachael Reeves “did nothing wrong” isn’t leadership — it’s reflex. A political auto-reply. And we’ve seen how these usually go:
- Day 1: “Full confidence.”
- Day 3: “Let’s not rush to judgment.”
- Day 5: “Resignation accepted.”
The real question isn’t whether Rachael Reeves did or didn’t do something wrong. It’s whether the PM actually thinks blind loyalty is a leadership quality, or just a PR fire blanket that happens to burst into flames every other week.
🔥 Challenges 🔥
Does the PM truly believe what he’s saying — or is “trust” just code for “please shut up until this dies down”? Why does this rinse-and-repeat routine still fool anyone? Hit the blog comments and let it rip. 💬🔥
👇 Tap comment. Tap share. Tap into your righteous sarcasm.
The sharpest responses will be featured in the next issue of the magazine. 🎯📝
Chameleon Magazine 
Leave a comment