Turns out the government did save money during the pandemic—just not in the way you’d hope. A grim new twist reveals that 23,000 people who should have received help or support never got the chance—because they’re dead. Victims of a botched response. Casualties of neglect. And now, conveniently, they’re just… savings on a spreadsheet.

☠️ Austerity by Attrition: Fewer Survivors, Fatter Budgets

Apparently, if you fail people hard enough, you don’t have to pay them. Brilliant! 🤡

The government’s pandemic policy basically became: delay, deny, deflect—and eventually, let the problem bury itself. And for 23,000 people, it did. No payouts. No justice. Just silence and cold, bureaucratic efficiency.

Imagine the meeting:

“Minister, we’ve reduced spending!”

“Fantastic! How’d we manage that?”

“By letting 23,000 people die before they could make a claim.”

You couldn’t make it up. And yet… they just carried on. No one sacked. No inquiry biting. Just a nation forced to move on while the state sweeps bodies under the budget line.

This wasn’t an accident. It was the cost of a strategy where indecision was policy and human life was collateral. They failed these people during COVID. Now they’re failing them in death too.

🔥 Challenges🔥

Why is this story buried under royal gossip and celebrity diets? Why are the families of the dead still shouting into a void? You’ve got the anger. You’ve got the voice. Let it out—in the blog comments, not just on your timeline. 💬

💣 Share. Rage. Post. Demand answers.

The most powerful comments and brutal truths will be featured in our next issue. 📣🖊️

Leave a comment

Ian McEwan

Why Chameleon?
Named after the adaptable and vibrant creature, Chameleon Magazine mirrors its namesake by continuously evolving to reflect the world around us. Just as a chameleon changes its colours, our content adapts to provide fresh, engaging, and meaningful experiences for our readers. Join us and become part of a publication that’s as dynamic and thought-provoking as the times we live in.

Let’s connect