Rachel Reeves walked past GB News like it was a pothole in a red carpet β€” and while some cheered her swerve, there’s a deeper issue rumbling underneath the viral silence. This wasn’t just a snub of a mic. It was a snub of millions of voters who tune into GB News β€” people who, whether you agree with them or not, deserve a government that answers to all of us. Not just the outlets it finds convenient.

🧨 When Ignoring Questions Becomes the Policy

Here’s the uncomfortable truth: the government doesn’t get to pick the press it prefers like it’s browsing a wine list. You don’t get to claim you’re β€œserving the people” while ghosting entire platforms watched by those very people.

Sure, politicians have PR strategies, but when you’re in public office, you answer to the public β€” not just the media you find flattering. GB News might not be everyone’s cup of tea, but it’s not state-funded, it’s not breaking laws, and its viewers pay their taxes like everyone else. What next? Only answering questions from BBC Breakfast and the occasional Vogue profile?

Let’s be crystal clear: this isn’t about defending a specific news outlet’s editorial line. It’s about defending the basic idea that democracy requires a full, messy, uncomfortable media ecosystem β€” not a curated playlist of approved voices.

If politicians start picking favourites, we don’t get β€œaccountable leadership.” We get spin rooms in echo chambers, where only friendly fire is allowed.

Reeves may have scored points with her base, but she missed a far bigger opportunity: to stand her ground, face tough questions, and prove that leadership means talking to everyone β€” not just those who clap.

🎯 

Challenges

 πŸŽ―

When did we decide politicians could ghost major broadcasters? Does blanking journalists mean blanking the public? Is it strong leadershipβ€”or selective dodging dressed up as strategy? Let us know what you think below. 🧐πŸ”₯

πŸ‘‡ Drop your thoughts in the blog comments β€” whether you back Reeves or back real press freedom.

Top replies will be featured in the next issue of the magazine. πŸ—žοΈπŸ“’

Leave a comment

Ian McEwan

Why Chameleon?
Named after the adaptable and vibrant creature, Chameleon Magazine mirrors its namesake by continuously evolving to reflect the world around us. Just as a chameleon changes its colours, our content adapts to provide fresh, engaging, and meaningful experiences for our readers. Join us and become part of a publication that’s as dynamic and thought-provoking as the times we live in.

Let’s connect