
Rachel Reeves walked past GB News like it was a pothole in a red carpet β and while some cheered her swerve, thereβs a deeper issue rumbling underneath the viral silence. This wasnβt just a snub of a mic. It was a snub of millions of voters who tune into GB News β people who, whether you agree with them or not, deserve a government that answers to all of us. Not just the outlets it finds convenient.
𧨠When Ignoring Questions Becomes the Policy
Hereβs the uncomfortable truth: the government doesnβt get to pick the press it prefers like itβs browsing a wine list. You donβt get to claim youβre βserving the peopleβ while ghosting entire platforms watched by those very people.
Sure, politicians have PR strategies, but when youβre in public office, you answer to the public β not just the media you find flattering. GB News might not be everyoneβs cup of tea, but itβs not state-funded, itβs not breaking laws, and its viewers pay their taxes like everyone else. What next? Only answering questions from BBC Breakfast and the occasional Vogue profile?
Letβs be crystal clear: this isnβt about defending a specific news outletβs editorial line. Itβs about defending the basic idea that democracy requires a full, messy, uncomfortable media ecosystem β not a curated playlist of approved voices.
If politicians start picking favourites, we donβt get βaccountable leadership.β We get spin rooms in echo chambers, where only friendly fire is allowed.
Reeves may have scored points with her base, but she missed a far bigger opportunity: to stand her ground, face tough questions, and prove that leadership means talking to everyone β not just those who clap.
π―
Challenges
π―
When did we decide politicians could ghost major broadcasters? Does blanking journalists mean blanking the public? Is it strong leadershipβor selective dodging dressed up as strategy? Let us know what you think below. π§π₯
π Drop your thoughts in the blog comments β whether you back Reeves or back real press freedom.
Top replies will be featured in the next issue of the magazine. ποΈπ’


Leave a comment