
🎙️🔒BBC’s leadership may be a finely polished braintrust — but it’s not exactly tea and biscuits with the public. While the top table boasts media moguls, finance wizards, and governance gurus, there’s a conspicuous absence of the one group actually paying for the show: you.
🎩 BBC’s Brain Trust: Brilliant but Barely Democratic
So the BBC board is clever. Top marks. They’ve got people who can spot a balance sheet error at twenty paces and know their way around a camera dolly. 👏 But here’s the catch: being clever and competent isn’t the same as being connected.
Because when you scan the boardroom table, you won’t find a single soul picked by the people footing the bill. No citizen reps. No public vote. No mandate. And barely a whisper from anyone who’s ever edited a local paper or told a story that didn’t have a PR agency behind it.
It’s like buying season tickets to a football club where you can’t vote for the manager, pick the team, or even boo from the stands. 📺⚽
And yes — before someone fires off a think piece — the solution isn’t to start chucking suits out the window. The point isn’t replacing experience. It’s injecting accountability. Building systems where licence-fee payers don’t just fund the content — they help shape the soul of the organisation.
Imagine citizens’ panels. Public editorial vetoes. A viewer-elected oversight board with real power, not a ceremonial biscuit tin. 🍪
Because if we’re going to fund the BBC like a national utility, we deserve a plug socket too.
🧨 Challenges 🧨
Who actually speaks for you inside the BBC? Why is “representation” always a behind-the-scenes buzzword instead of front-page policy? Is it time for viewers to have a real vote — not just in ratings, but in relevance?
💬 We want your take. Loud, funny, furious or factual. Dive into the blog comments — don’t just shout at the telly.
👇 Smash that comment, like, and share button. Let’s reprogram the BBC from the bottom up.
The best responses will be published in the next issue of our magazine. 🎙️🗞️


Leave a comment