While a sitting MP racks up a nine-year corruption conviction overseas, Westminster is perfecting the ancient art of doing absolutely nothing. The public? Baffled. The government? Mute. Democracy? Left on read.
🤐 The Silence of the Backbenchers
So let’s get this straight: a British Member of Parliament has been sentenced by a foreign court for corruption related to a housing scheme — and our reaction is… to ghost the whole situation like a bad Tinder date?
Sure, Bangladesh isn’t exactly the poster child for judicial transparency. Political vendettas, kangaroo courts, and shaky legal theatrics abound. But that’s precisely why inaction isn’t neutrality — it’s negligence dressed up in a Savile Row suit.
Because the issue isn’t what Bangladesh did.
It’s what Britain isn’t doing.
Where’s the UK probe? The statement from the Parliamentary Standards Commissioner? The gentle cough from the Speaker saying, “Erm, should we maybe check this out?” Parliament is treating this like an awkward family secret—hoping if we don’t bring it up, it’ll just disappear into the upholstery.
Spoiler: it won’t.
🛫 Heathrow is Not a Corruption Car Wash
An MP doesn’t get to shake off scandal by simply passing through Terminal 5. If you’re voting on national laws, drawing a taxpayer salary, and shouting “Order!” while under international legal scrutiny, your seat in Parliament should come with more than just a comfy chair and a subsidised gin.
No one’s saying “believe Bangladesh.”
We’re saying “believe in accountability.”
Because right now we’ve got:
- A corruption conviction abroad
- Absolutely no UK investigation
- Zero Parliamentary inquiry
- Radio silence from the ethics squad
The current approach is less “rule of law” and more “vibes-based governance.” And frankly, the vibes are rancid.
⚖️ Democracy Without Standards Is Just Politics With Better Lighting
Imagine this were any other job. You get convicted abroad, and your employer doesn’t even ask if it’s true? Doesn’t so much as email HR? Meanwhile, you keep collecting pay, making decisions, and pretending nothing happened?
Only in Westminster does a corruption conviction get treated like an inconvenient Instagram tag: awkward, but ignorable.
If the MP is innocent, they deserve a UK-led exoneration.
If they’re not, the public deserves justice.
But right now? We’ve got nothing but a big, fat, parliamentary shrug.
🏛️ Welcome to the Safe House for the Slightly Scandalous
If this becomes the norm — where an MP can be sentenced abroad and Parliament doesn’t even flinch — then the UK isn’t a beacon of democracy. It’s a political halfway house with better PR.
Let’s be honest: we’ve already had sleaze, second homes, dodgy PPE deals, and more resignations than a reality TV reunion. The last thing Westminster needs is to become a sanctuary for the ethically AWOL.
Trust in politics is not some loyalty card you keep swiping.
It’s a currency — and right now, Parliament is bouncing cheques.
🇬🇧 Britain: Proud Protector of… What, Exactly?
No one is calling for blind faith in foreign courts. But pretending this isn’t newsworthy? That’s not caution. That’s cowardice with cufflinks.
Protect from persecution? Absolutely.
Protect from accountability? Never.
But the UK is doing neither. Just sitting there like, “Well, this is awkward,” while public confidence quietly leaks out the back of the Commons like gas from a poorly fitted boiler.
🔥 Challenges 🔥
How long can Parliament play dumb before people start asking, “What is the job of an MP again?” Have we officially replaced “public service” with “career preservation at all costs”? Drop your hot takes, scalding rants, or surgical critiques in the blog comments. Don’t just moan on Facebook. 💬🚨
👇 Comment, share, like — and don’t let Westminster keep getting away with a wink and a nap.
The best insights, questions, and roasts will feature in the next issue of the magazine. 🗞️🔥
Chameleon Magazine 
Leave a comment