Chameleon Magazine

So let’s get this straight: migrants are “welcome” — as long as they’re pouring concrete, changing bedpans, or driving night buses. But when it comes to robes, power, or paychecks with more than three digits? Suddenly the gate slams shut.

👷 “You’re Here to Work, Not to Rule” – The Unspoken Rule of British Politics

The outrage isn’t really about migration — it’s about where migrants are allowed to exist. And you’ve nailed it: if they’re good enough to build our hospitals, why not run them? If they can fix the plumbing at Westminster, why not sit inside it?

The answer? Hypocrisy dressed in patriotism.

The same system that relies on migrant workers to hold up the economy turns into a fortress when you suggest power, wealth, or legacy roles could be shared. You want diversity in the trenches, not in the throne room. A migrant nurse = “hero.” A migrant politician = “threat.” That’s not immigration policy — that’s class preservation with a flag on it.

So yes, it is suspiciously convenient that the only jobs migrants are “taking” are the ones no one wants to protect. Meanwhile, the House of Lords floats on, tax-free and title-heavy, immune from any actual shake-up.

We don’t need less immigration. We need fewer double standards.

🔥 Challenges 🔥

Why are migrants only “acceptable” when they’re overworked and underpaid? Why is no one demanding immigrant lords, civil servants, or CEOs? If equality’s the goal, shouldn’t it start at the top? ⚖️

👇 Sound off in the comments. Like, share, and tag someone who’s ever been told to “know their place.”

The boldest responses will be featured in the next issue of the magazine. 💥💬