
Β π³οΈπ«Local elections arenβt a courtesy. Theyβre the bare minimum of democracy. So when one gets yanked off the calendar like an overdue library book, itβs not just a clerical shrugβitβs a political snub with a smug grin.
π§Ό Bureaucratic Housekeeping or Democratic Gaslighting?
Ah yes, the classic βadministrative decision.β Just a bit of political spring cleaning, right? Move a few files, erase a few ballots, silence a few thousand voicesβnothing major. After all, why bother with messy, unpredictable elections when a few enlightened folks can just decide for us? Like toddlers being told not to touch the stove, weβre expected to nod quietly while our democratic rights are put in a drawer labeled βToo Complicated for You.β
Cancelling an election is the bureaucratic equivalent of saying, βShhh, the adults are talking.β
It tells the public: your input is ornamental. Your consent is conditional. Your judgment? Cute, but inconvenient.
And the justification? Usually wrapped in jargon thicker than a 500-page PDFββstrategic alignment,β βgovernance frameworks,β or some other linguistic yoga pose that bends around accountability like itβs radioactive.
But hereβs the real translation:
βWe donβt trust you not to choose wrong.β
Not βwrongβ as in morally incorrectβjust wrong for their interests, their control, their plans.
And thatβs not democracy. Thatβs managerial feudalism with a Wi-Fi connection. π§ π
β οΈΒ ChallengesΒ β οΈ
What do you think about having your voice penciled out like a bad meeting note? Should we accept βpostponed democracyβ as the new normal? Or should we be making noise every time our right to vote is treated like a variable cost?
π¬ Get loud in the blog comments. Not just on Facebookβright here where it counts. Say what youβre thinking, even if they donβt want to hear it.
π Tap comment. Tap share. Tap into your fury.
The sharpest takes and truth hammers will make it into our next issue. π§¨π


Leave a comment