
🏛️📱Nothing says “public servant” like allegedly helping your son cover up a rape investigation. Enter Naheed Ejaz, a 61-year-old Labour mayor, who—according to court testimony—delayed police access so her 41-year-old son, Diwan Khan, could stash a phone believed to contain video evidence of the rape.
That’s right. In a plot twist that makes political satire feel like a documentary, the person elected to uphold public trust may have used her status to obstruct justice in one of the most serious criminal cases imaginable.
🤐 When the Mayor’s Chain Becomes a Gag Order
Let’s break this down:
Your son gets arrested for rape.
Police arrive.
And your first instinct isn’t cooperation, but to stall the officers while he allegedly hides the evidence?
This isn’t just a moral collapse—it’s a trust-nuking detonation. Politicians love to bang on about “due process” and “integrity,” but when the flashing lights land on their own doorstep, we suddenly enter the Hide and Seek: Crime Scene Edition.
What does this say to survivors? To the public? To anyone who still harboured hope that elected officials would uphold the law, not help their sons sneak around it?
This isn’t about party lines. This is about power corroding accountability so completely that someone allegedly believed they could turn a rape charge into a family secret—with just a bit of time and a missing phone.
🚨 Challenges 🚨
How much faith do you still have in any of them? Have we normalized abuse of power so much that even this story barely cracks the headlines? We want your fury. Your disbelief. Your comments—on the blog, not just Twitter.


Leave a comment