🧑⚖️🕶️Keir Starmer: former prosecutor, forensic mind, and apparently completely baffled by the dangers of appointing Lord Mandelson—a man who’s been booted from Cabinet twice, came with enough red flags to host a Soviet parade, and appears in Epstein’s contact book like it’s a networking app.
⚖️ Justice for the Chosen — Warnings for the Rest
We’re meant to believe that Starmer, QC extraordinaire, couldn’t possibly foresee the reputational fallout of tying his leadership to Mandelson like a flaming tire around his own credibility.
Yet this is the same man who thinks working-class mothers, protestors, or online ranters should be prosecuted with full force…
while his old pals get patronage, platform, and peerages.
You see, in the Church of Sir Keir, justice is not blind.
It just squints really hard when it’s inconvenient.
Why are judges handing out tap-on-the-wrist sentences for serious crimes?
Why does theft get you bail, but political dissent gets you surveillance?
Because people like Starmer have decided who is redeemable and who is expendable.
Lord Mandelson? “He’s changed.”
A teenage looter? “Straight to jail.”
Rapist with a sad story? “Needs support.”
Shopkeeper who defended their store? “Dangerous escalation.”
This isn’t justice—it’s ideological roulette.
If Mandelson had been anyone else—a Tory, a Brexit supporter, a woman with a working-class accent—Starmer would’ve thrown the book.
Instead, he offered a seat at the table.
🧨 Challenges 🧨
Are we expected to believe Starmer didn’t know better—or that he simply didn’t care? What does “judgment” mean when it only applies to people outside your circle? Jump in the blog comments and let the gavel drop. ⚖️🔥
Chameleon Magazine 
Leave a comment