🤖⚠️Yes, digital misogyny is toxic sludge that seeps from the worst corners of the internet into real-world harm. We should be treating it seriously. But when the state starts drafting teenage boys into the “potential future incels” category like they’re malware-infected USBs, we may have a slightly more complicated problem than can be solved by another PSHE lesson and a TikTok dance about respect.
🎯 From “Education” to Indoctrination Lite™️
Here’s how it goes down: The state wants to tackle misogyny, so it builds a framework. Good. Necessary. But then comes the file marked “Teen Boys,” and suddenly we’re assigning risk profiles like we’re running a preventative prison intake.
One wrong meme? Red flag.
Too many Andrew Tate clips in your feed? You, young man, are now a societal timebomb.
The trouble? Teen boys aren’t hard drives. They’re hormonal chaos in hoodies, caught between YouTube rage reels and “respect women” school posters printed in Comic Sans. The moment you frame them as ideological suspects, they tune out. Or worse—double down.
This isn’t education. This is algorithmic whack-a-mole disguised as moral policy.
If schools become the front line, but algorithms remain the war machine, then congratulations: you’ve just tried to cure radiation poisoning with a glow-in-the-dark sticker.
It’s not about softening the stance on misogyny—it’s about not turning boys into psychological booby traps while ignoring the systemic clickbait culture that feeds this rot. Want change? Fix the feed, not just the kids.
💣 Challenges 💣
What’s more dangerous: the toxic messages or the way we overreact to them? Is this genuine prevention or the ideological grooming of boys into fear and shame? Drop your take in the blog comments 🧠🔥
👇 Like, share, and COMMENT if you’ve seen the algorithm twist a kid’s brain—or if you’re tired of policy pretending classrooms can fix code.
The sharpest comments will be featured in the next Chameleon News issue. 🧩🗞️
Chameleon Magazine 
Leave a comment