Labour has already discovered that pensioners are a wonderfully convenient place to look when the Treasury needs a few quid. Keir Starmer’s government restricted Winter Fuel Payments before later retreating amid the political backlash. Now Andy Burnham is talking about a new social-care settlement, insisting that “everyone” will contribute — and suddenly the state pension triple lock is being discussed as somewhere the money might come from.
Nobody has announced the abolition of the triple lock. That matters. But pensioners could be forgiven for looking nervously at the curtains whenever a politician starts talking about “difficult choices”, because those choices have a remarkable habit of ending up in somebody else’s bank account.
Apparently Retirement Now Comes With a Funding Responsibility 🧾
Burnham says he wants a major reform of social care and plans to put the proposal before voters at the next general election. He has also said he will not break the current manifesto commitment protecting the triple lock during this Parliament. So far, so reassuring.
Except that ITV’s Robert Peston has highlighted what he sees as some fairly enormous clues about what could happen afterwards. Burnham has said the reform belongs in the next manifesto, that everyone will contribute towards the new care system, and that the funding mechanism would be different from the NHS. Peston’s interpretation is that reform of the triple lock could form part of the funding package — although he explicitly says he is not certain that this is Burnham’s plan.
And therein lies the problem.
When politicians say, “We’re not doing that,” voters have learned to listen very carefully for the words “in this Parliament.”
It is Westminster’s version of a magician showing you an empty sleeve while somebody backstage wheels in the elephant.
First Britain tells people to work for decades and contribute.
Then retirement arrives.
Then governments discover that pensioners apparently possess an enormous untapped natural resource called their own money.
Need to demonstrate “fiscal responsibility” to the markets? Somebody fetch the pension spreadsheet.
🔥 Challenges: Should Pensioners Be Paying for Social Care Through Their Pensions?
If social care needs billions more, should politicians be looking anywhere near the triple lock — or should a government promising a new national system find the money elsewhere? And if the triple lock really is being considered for reform after the next election, should Labour simply come out and say so now? Tell us what you think in the comments on the Chameleon News blog.
👇 Comment, like and share — especially if you think “protected” should actually mean protected.
Leave a comment