
🎄👑📸The Duke and Duchess of Sussex may be returning to Britain, but moving back across the Atlantic apparently does not come with an automatic upgrade to Christmas dinner with the Royal Family.
Harry and Meghan are returning as private, non-working members of the Royal Family, with no announced restoration of official royal duties. The King is reportedly pleased at the prospect of seeing more of the family privately, but relations elsewhere in the House of Windsor remain decidedly less Hallmark Christmas movie and rather more Succession with corgis. 🐕🍿 (ITVX)
And as speculation grows over whether they’ll appear at Sandringham this Christmas, perhaps the Palace has already discovered the logistical difficulty:
They said they couldn’t make room for the camera crews and ghostwriters. 🎥📚😂
🎬From Netflix to Norfolk: The Great Sussex Homecoming
There is something magnificently British about leaving the Royal Family, producing programmes about leaving the Royal Family, writing books about leaving the Royal Family, giving interviews explaining why you left the Royal Family… and then moving back down the road from the Royal Family.
It’s less Megxit and more Megxit: The Return — now streaming exclusively from the Home Counties. 🍿🇬🇧
Meghan’s professional comeback has generated drama of its own. She was reportedly discussing a role in a future series of Guy Ritchie’s Netflix hit The Gentlemen, but subsequent reports claimed the proposed casting had been withdrawn following a fierce UK backlash. Neither Netflix nor Meghan has publicly confirmed the reported collapse of the deal, so for the moment the whole affair remains showbusiness fog rather than Buckingham Palace proclamation. (The Guardian)
Which is unfortunate, because a Guy Ritchie production about aristocrats, money, family feuds and questionable alliances sounds suspiciously like Meghan wouldn’t even have needed a script. 🎭
Meanwhile, there’s another little matter:
security. 🚔💷
Harry and Meghan lost automatic taxpayer-funded police protection after stepping down as working royals. Their arrangements on returning to Britain remain unresolved, with the decision ultimately involving the specialist process that assesses protection according to risk rather than simply handing somebody a police convoy because their grandmother appeared on the stamps. (The Times)
Prime Minister Andy Burnham has declined to say who might ultimately pay, describing the issue as a private matter. (The Guardian)
And therein lies the political comedy.
Apparently they’re private citizens when discussing royal duties.
Private citizens when choosing where to live.
Private citizens when signing television deals.
Private citizens when launching commercial ventures.
But suddenly the taxpayer gets mentioned and everyone starts rummaging around the constitutional attic looking for the “Actually, technically, still a prince” clause. 👑💰
To be fair, genuine threats against Harry or his family should be assessed seriously. Protection decisions should be based on professional risk assessments, not whether somebody likes Meghan’s jam, Harry’s autobiography or King Charles’s Christmas speech.
But taxpayers are also entitled to ask a fairly straightforward question:
If immensely wealthy private individuals choose to live in Britain while conducting private commercial careers, where exactly should public responsibility end and their own security bill begin?
Because Britain cannot really operate a system where somebody resigns from the royal job but keeps checking whether the company car is still available. 🚘👋
And Christmas?
Perhaps reconciliation will eventually prevail.
Perhaps Charles will invite everybody to Sandringham, William will produce the crackers, Harry will carve the turkey and Meghan will promise Netflix that absolutely nobody is wearing a microphone.
Or perhaps the Palace simply sends the traditional festive message:
“Lovely to have you back. Unfortunately we’re full.” 🎄😂
🔥Challenges🔥
So what do you think?
Should Harry and Meghan be welcomed back into private Royal Family gatherings without hesitation?
Should taxpayers fund their protection if professional security assessments conclude they face a sufficiently serious threat — or should two wealthy non-working royals pay the bill themselves?
And most importantly:
Would YOU invite them to Christmas dinner knowing there might be another memoir before Easter? 📖🥂😬
👇 Get into the blog comments — not just Facebook. Comment, like and share, and tell us whether this is a genuine family reconciliation or simply the most expensive reboot British television never commissioned.
The best comments, one-liners and gloriously savage observations will be featured in the magazine. 🎯📝


Leave a comment